On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:31:26AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Tuesday 13 July 2010 09:48:13 Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > Aha, good to hear. This means that, unless nsmux opens bogus ports > > (which I don't remember), the anonymous translators will actually go > > away after the timeout with the current design. > > And that means: nothing missing, nsmux works as it should?
Apparently, nsmux is capable of performing a basic subset of functionality it was designed to be capable of doing. I can remember myself trying a number (not a considerable one, though) of tests that proved that nsmux starts translators nicely, but I never tried to see whether anonymous translators went away on their own. You'd better wait until antrik has his final answer to this question, as I am somewhat afraid to respond in a binary way... :-) Best regards, Sergiu
