Hello!
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 08:23:22AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Dienstag, 15. September 2009 08:56:24 schrieb Arne
Babenhauserheide:
Since the Hurd has bindings for using common Lisp for translators,
you can
in fact use Lisp to write part of an OS (the attached snapshot is
the
version from Tue Sep 16 15:50:43 2008 - I had a disk failure which
ate a
part of the repositories history; I already asked Flavio if he
still has
an intact clone lying around).
I now got the whole repository directly from the maintainer of
freehg.org
(Matthew Marshall) and used the great hg-git extension to
transparently (and
mostly effortlessly) move changes between git and hg.
So you can now find the cl-lisp repository at bitbucket *and*
gitorious:
- http://gitorious.org/cl-hurd/cl-hurd
- http://bitbucket.org/ArneBab/cl-hurd
Flávio, I understand it correctly that these repositories represent
the
whole development, and the commits in your Hurd CVS branch
(flaviocruz-soc2008-lisp-branch) are only aggregations of these?
Then,
it'd be more logical to just use the cl-hurd Git repository (as
offered
on gitorious) instead of converting the CVS branch to Git. Everyone
agrees?
Hello!,
Yes, the CVS branch only contains the aggregation of the original
commits and I agree on keeping the original version (non-CVS-branch).
If it hasn't been integrated into our main repositories yet, now's
the time :)
Doing that right now.
Where can I find it? :)
In the longer term, do we intend to keep all these repositories in
sync
(Savannah, gitorious: Git; bitbucket: hg), or do we retire all but
one of
them? Pros / cons?
I guess it's better to keep just one version...
Regards,
Thomas
Regards,
Flávio.
