Hello! On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 08:23:22AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Dienstag, 15. September 2009 08:56:24 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide: > > Since the Hurd has bindings for using common Lisp for translators, you can > > in fact use Lisp to write part of an OS (the attached snapshot is the > > version from Tue Sep 16 15:50:43 2008 - I had a disk failure which ate a > > part of the repositories history; I already asked Flavio if he still has > > an intact clone lying around). > > I now got the whole repository directly from the maintainer of freehg.org > (Matthew Marshall) and used the great hg-git extension to transparently (and > mostly effortlessly) move changes between git and hg. > > So you can now find the cl-lisp repository at bitbucket *and* gitorious: > > - http://gitorious.org/cl-hurd/cl-hurd > - http://bitbucket.org/ArneBab/cl-hurd
Flávio, I understand it correctly that these repositories represent the whole development, and the commits in your Hurd CVS branch (flaviocruz-soc2008-lisp-branch) are only aggregations of these? Then, it'd be more logical to just use the cl-hurd Git repository (as offered on gitorious) instead of converting the CVS branch to Git. Everyone agrees? > If it hasn't been integrated into our main repositories yet, now's the time > :) Doing that right now. In the longer term, do we intend to keep all these repositories in sync (Savannah, gitorious: Git; bitbucket: hg), or do we retire all but one of them? Pros / cons? Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
