Hello! On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:00:52PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 11:05:50PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > +After commit e227045b06d62ee7d2fbab9d5ade9030ff43170b, Git's commit > > messages > > +are valid. > > Is it really *after*, or starting with?... > > A less ambiguous wording would be preferable :-)
Yes, I'm myself not entirely happy with the wording. e227 is the last CVS commit. So indeed *after* that one the pure Git ones begin. (Obviously we can't know the SHA1 of the commit to-be-created, so we can't use that one as ``starting with''.) Or is there some flaw in my logic? Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
