Hi, On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > <olafbuddenha...@gmx.net> writes:
> > settrans veth /hurd/unionfs veth veth,,eth-multiplexer > > unionfs has option ``-u'' which tells it to include the underlying > node in the list of the merged filesystems, so this command should be > rewritten like > > settrans veth /hurd/unionfs -u veth,,eth-multiplexer Ah, interesting. > I think that doing in the way you suggest will not result in something > useful, because when unionfs opens node ``veth'', this node will > already be translated by unionfs itself, which means that unionfs will > not have access to the underlying filesystem, as it was obviously > intended. Is that really so? That's not very useful behaviour... Though I can see that it might be hard for unionfs to do handle it differently. Anyways, I think we should be able to work around it, by using the filter: veth,,--,,eth-multiplexer :-) (Might be protential for deadlocks, though...) -antrik-
