On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 07:18:34PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > Carl Fredrik Hammar <hammy.l...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I actually realized a couple of days ago that unionmount could probably > >> be done by a combination of nsmux and unionfs: I think it should be > >> possible to do something like > >> > >> settrans veth /hurd/unionfs veth veth,,eth-multiplexer > >> > >> (I didn't want to bring this up yet, to avoid further confusion :-) ) > > > > Bootstrapping a unionmount of nsmux like might be tricky. ;-) > > Hm, browsing through my memory I cannot remember why setting a > unionmount translator via nsmux would be tricky. It's no trickier that > setting it through settrans, IMHO :-)
It was just intended as a quick comment, but perhaps I should of explained further. In the example nsmux is used to do a unionmount, but nsmux itself is a translator you'd want to unionmount. So you'd need an unionmount of nsmux to unionmount nsmux, in which case you'd already have a nsmux instance you can use. :-) Regards, Fredrik
