Hi that is a bit dissapointing, I guess your right. Of course, I never
intended to under value the work contributed thus far. I could only afford a
small incentive but essentially agree with your post.

2008/9/13 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 08:10:56PM +1200, Gregory Plummer wrote:
>
> > Hi all, I would like to offer a small cash incentive for tasks needing
> > to be completed. It would be great if the Hurd could support file
> > systems greater than 2 GB in size. How would I go about sponsoring
> > this feature? Some input on the best way to do this would be
> > appreciated.
>
> First of all, please don't get me wrong: We greatly appreciate your
> offer! :-)
>
> However, I don't think that bounties for completed tasks are the best
> approach.
>
> The main problem with bounties is that they usually greatly undervalue
> the necessary work: In this case, as Michael explained, it's not quite
> clear, as the code is already there, and "only" needs to made ready for
> upstream acceptance; however, if it was to be implemented from scratch,
> the cost of a developer at a typical salary would easily amount to
> $10000 or more...
>
> Now one could argue of course that the bounties are not meant to attract
> professional developers, but hobbyists etc. -- however, anyone who can
> complete such a task -- even if he is a college kid still -- should have
> no trouble finding a much better paid job...
>
> Thus the money itself is hardly motivation enough -- it can only be
> considered symbolic, only a fraction of the real value of the work... So
> if we indeed have people willing to do it at this symbolic price, there
> must already be enough other motivation to cover all the rest -- some
> genuine interest and willingness to contribute to the project.
>
> Isn't it a better investment then, to try to further these kinds of
> motivation, so they fill also the missing bit; by making the project
> more interesting, more visible? For example by sponsoring developer
> conferences, or some small PR work perhaps?...
>
> -antrik-
>
>

Reply via email to