[EMAIL PROTECTED], le Mon 25 Aug 2008 21:59:02 +0200, a écrit : > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:46:52AM +0200, Da Zheng wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 03:27:06PM +0200, zhengda wrote: > > >>> - socket_t server; > >>> + socket_t server = MACH_PORT_NULL; > >> > >> As I already said, this is unnecessary -- it will be assigned > >> unconditionally. > >> > > It's necessary here. If __asprintf() returns -1, the function jumps to > > out, cleans up and returns. > > Well, it should return an error code, and any values passed back from > the function are unspecified -- it's quite normal that functions don't > try to set "sane" values upon failure...
Sure, but the error code _is_ server being MACH_PORT_NULL ;) Samuel
