On Wednesday 19 March 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But do we *want* to preserve that terrible state?... > > Sooner or later we will *have* to release -- and the longer we wait, > the stronger the pressure to come up with something ground breaking. It > get's worse and worse. We need to break this evil circle; the sooner we > do that, the less painful it will be. > > The strategy I suggest is to create a 0.3 release very soon; put up the > tarball and some release notes on the server, but never announce it > anywhere. A bit later, do that again with 0.3.1. Maybe with 0.3.2 or so > we could already announce it in a very careful manner. With 0.3.3, more > openly. And so on. > > This way, by the time most people realize that we are doing releases > (again), it will be business as usual. "Yeah, right, another > development release. We have been doing these for some time now, > haven't you noticed?..." > A release could be made using a mock Maxi-Optical image tree. This would be about 10-15 gig. (The image tree is used to build an iso). But not by me, I am retiring. Phil. -- Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand +64 3 488 2818 Fax +64 3 488 2875 Mobile 027 663 4453 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - personal. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - business
