----- Original Message -----
From: "Constantine Kousoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <bug-hurd@gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [task #5487] cthreads -> pthreads
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Follow-up Comment #1, task #5487 (project hurd):
Attached is the work that Vicente Hernando Ara has been doing years ago,
see
<http://web.archive.org/web/20040213013636/es.gnu.org/~zenton/Pthread/>.
This link is obsolete.
From Savannah (http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?5487):
"... To gain greater portability, the libraries and servers should be
ported to pthreads (which we also have a mostly functional implementation
for in the Hurd)."
What exactly does the term "mostly functional implementation" mean?
Has anyone considered using GNU Portable Threads
(http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/) with the Hurd? Maybe they are easier to
become "fully functional" since they are "portable".
Sorry for the overdose of questions.
Thanks,
Constantine
Constantine,
Does this mean you are done with the 2.6 driver code? ;-)
Barry deFreese (aka bddebian)
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
