On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 03:21:29PM +0200, Constantine Kousoulos wrote:
> What exactly does the term "mostly functional implementation" mean?

Many things work, a few don't.

> Has anyone considered using GNU Portable Threads 
> (http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/) with the Hurd? Maybe they are 
> easier to become "fully functional" since they are "portable".

Mach is designed for high concurrency. GNU Pth is a userland implementation
of threads, and is quite hairy. It should definitely be avoided when
native kernel threads are available...

-- 
Richard Braun

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Reply via email to