On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 09:11 -0200, Matheus Morais wrote: > On 1/30/06, Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > The patch contains a gratuitous change which > is not explained. This is sufficient reason for us to not > consider the > patch. > > Thanks, > Marcus > > This is applied for the first patch too?
This applies to all patches in general, but we use discretion of course. We also take into account our past experiences with the submitter's attitude and our impression of the submitter's technical aptitude. Thanks, Marcus _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
