"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There were such people, I am/was one of those people. My personal > feeling is that L4 is cool, but Mach is simply more feasible to get to > a point where it would be useful and decent.
Then work on that. I don't think anyone is telling you what to do here. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
