"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The facts are that even a person like me who has been around these > parts for an awfully long time doesn't even know what the heck to > spend time on. It isn't something as trivial as deciding if one > should fix rpctrace to be a bit saner, fixing tmpfs, maybe just > improving Mach, or deciding how some internal part of exec should be > handled. It is about a whole different code base. If the code bases > were API compatible, then all would be good, but they aren't and > probobly won't be even close to compatible.
I think the answer to this question is: we don't know. Work on the L4 codebase is valuable in my opinion; work on the Mach codebase is valuable. They are both valuable in different ways, and I think that there is not a good reason to regard them as so separable. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
