El mié, 09-11-2005 a las 02:00 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann escribió:
> Of course, I don't speak for Roland or Thomas. But as far as I know,
> the direction of the Hurd has not changed at all. The Hurd-on-L4
> efforts are an evaluation of a new design. Until such a design
> emerges as a viable alternative, there is nothing to decide.
That's the point. Until that evaluation reaches something concrete and
_feasible_, I don't see the need to stop Mach/Hurd development, IMHO
both projects can work and follow its own way. In fact, I would like to
encourage all people to restart working ("working" means coding, but
also testing and discussing about design issues) again on GNU Mach/GNU
Hurd to make the final effort that it needs to become a production
system (the GNU System).
Happy Hacking!
--
Sergio Lopez
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
