Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Right, but -g does not set the route like we need it for DHCP. I >> understand if you do not like the name of the option, but that does >> not make it useless. > > I never said it was useless. I said it was poorly named. It probably also > overloads too many settings.
In that case I misunderstood you, sorry. What would be a better name? The overloading of settings can be fixed, if that is important. -- Marco _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
