Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Except I think it's a mistake to label those "linux-specific". The > > danger of that is that as soon as it gets implemented on some other > > system, it ceases to be Linux specific. > > Like I already said three times, something that can conceivably be generic > belongs in a generic place.
There was some suggestion of "putting it in any Hurd library", and the like... Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
