who and w have always been different things. who is fine as it is and has nothing to do with w. We have the Hurd's w and uptime because they are better than other versions.
Pardon me, but I disagree. First of all, our uptime isn't better then "other versions", the one in coreutils does the exact same thing. And really, I can't see how uptime can be better or worse... :-) Secondly, w and who may have always been different things, but this does not mean that we cannot move w into coreutils. Or extend who with the options that w has, and then have w as a alias or whatever. Even right now `who --all' produces something close to the output of `w'. Cheers. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
