On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:43:01PM +0200, Farid Hajji wrote: > > > I think we should disallow direct inclusion of <linux/*.h> in Glibc, any > > > comments? > > There don't exist any <linux/*.h> headers in glibc, they come from > > Linux. > > Perhaps glibc should provide its own <linux/*.h> wrappers which > would spew out warnings, but still #include the real linux headers > (I assume something from /usr/src/linux/include/*.h or whatever) > anyway?
Good idea, I'll propose that as it sounds better than maintaining a set of patches. -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion) _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
