On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:43:01PM +0200, Farid Hajji wrote: > > > I think we should disallow direct inclusion of <linux/*.h> in Glibc, any > > > comments? > > There don't exist any <linux/*.h> headers in glibc, they come from > > Linux. > > Perhaps glibc should provide its own <linux/*.h> wrappers which > would spew out warnings, but still #include the real linux headers > (I assume something from /usr/src/linux/include/*.h or whatever) > anyway?
This is just too much of a burden for little gain. Everybody who uses <linux/*> headers in general applications doesn't know what he is doing. They will just #define USE_LINUX or whatever to get rid of the warning/error. The real solution here is teaching people to do the right thing, not putting silly things in glibc which don't solve the problem at all. Jeroen Dekkers _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
