Hello,
Sorry to barge into the filesystems discussion, but I'm wondering
whether the hurd team has decided on what level exactly to bind the hurd
to a microkernel ? The last I heard of this on the l4-hurd list was a
discussion about ripping up the libc library once again, I think by
Farid Hajji or so. I'm writing to ask whether its been decided how to
tackle this issue of portability, which indirectly affects the
portability of the Hurd as a whole. For example, has anyone decided what
to do about the Hurd's bindings to Mach ports ? It tickles to me read
things like, "netbsd, the most portable OS in the world", and stuff like
that.
Cheers,
George.
--
________________________________________________________________________________
Quote for the Week:
- "If the ax is dull and its edge unsharpened, more strength is
needed but skill will bring success." (Ecclesiastes 10:10 NIV)
Cherry George Mathew, /~\ The ASCII
II/157, Thyparampil Veedu, \ / Ribbon
Campaign
Eraviperoor P.O X Against
Kerala, / \ HTML
e-mail
India 689542,
Tel:+91-473-663982
http://resumes.yahoo.com/berryplumis/myprofile/
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
