On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 05:38:44PM -0700, James Morrison wrote:
> > Pthreads already has recursive locks as an X/Open extension, I don't
> > think such changes are needed because we will switch to pthreads
> > within a few months anyhow.
>
> So what is in cvs is good for testing in a {sub,neighbour,n-}hurd?Thread-local storage, the locking functions and pthread_kill() don't work yet, I doubt you get anything usable. I don't know how stable glibc 2.3 is, I've fixed some bugs in the past when testing glibc+pthreads using make check. If you want something to test and play with, build a glibc 2.3 based system and make sure it works good. If you need something to hack, make sure all test cases work (the last time I ran make check on glibc 2.3 I got 89 test failures). At the moment I'm busy with a lot of things, especially school (the end of the year is always a busy period). When my vacation starts (about 4 weeks from now) I have plenty of time to hack pthreads and other things. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC ID: jeroen@openprojects GNU supporter - http://www.gnu.org
msg05118/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
