> Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Oops, that was something in my tree that I checked in by mistake. > > I've reverted it (no log entry). > > Ooh, but illuminate... what's the idea behind it?
This was the change that came up on the thread "fatfs locking". It might still be desireable for fatfs, but I don't know enough about that case to really be sure. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
