> On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 05:12:30PM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote: > > Wrong. The only reliance that um-pppd has on pfinet is a tunnel > > device; everything else is pretty much standard. > > And the tunnel device has all the semantics from the BSD tunnel device, > because that was my reference implementation at that time.
We're probably not talking about the same ppp version anymore. The tunnel device in pfinet behaves correctly, but try to compile a recent ppp, e.g. taken ouf of the FreeBSD -STABLE or even -CURRENT tree. Good luck! I'd be really impressed if that worked without Ng*()!! -Farid. -- Farid Hajji -- Unix Systems and Network Admin | Phone: +49-2131-67-555 Broicherdorfstr. 83, D-41564 Kaarst, Germany | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - One OS To Rule Them All And In The Darkness Bind Them... --Bill Gates. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
