On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 10:02:01AM +0000, Chris Lingard wrote: > > Firstly, let me verify what we are dealing with. It was only hurd that you > > recompiled with the new gcc, not glibc, right? FWIW, my Hurds have been running Glibcs compiled with 2.95.2 since late November/early December. I haven't noticed any problems related to this (In fact, the system seemed a little faster - no quantifiable data, sorry). Tks, Jeff Bailey (WooHoo - 650 on my GMAT yesterday <smile, I'll shut up now...>)
- Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Jeff Bailey
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Jeff Bailey
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Jeff Bailey
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard