Hello, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: [...] >> Taking a step back, I think we can sidestep the issue entirely. Based >> on 45mg’s initial work, I added (git graph). This includes >> ‘graph-descendant?’, which is all we need in (guix git). >> >> So I think I’ll revert the offending commit >> (cd91dc908ac4b215bc87a97455ff64ed4d89b721) and then come up with a patch >> in Guix to use ‘graph-descendant?’ instead of our home-made graph >> traversal code. >> >> How does that sound? > > I think that sounds like a great plan. Using the new graph-descendant? > should make the code both correct and faster, so win-win. :) Yup! I tagged Guile-Git 0.10.0 and sent this patch: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/77875 Thanks for your feedback! Ludo’.