On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:46:53PM +0100, Rutherther wrote: > I cannot really find anything that would make this > explanation implausible in this thread. Am I missing something? > Were you guys somehow able to actually *verify* it's guix writing zeros > and not the files getting corrupted afterwards?
I think your explanation is plausible, way more plausible that Guix writing empty files.
