Hi, Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Maxim, > > On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 21:49, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I preferred inheritance to avoid having to manually sync things in the >> long run... (hopefully the graft gets ungrafted before 'patch' amasses >> new phatces, but we never know...) > > What would be the long run? ;-) > Well, from my perspective, there is nothing to manually sync in the > future. You're probably right. > I mean, the only patch applied to release “2.7.6” will be still required > for patch/fixed; hence one will need to do what I am proposing if > ’patch’ is removed. Else if ’patch’ receives some security fixes, then > it seems expected to assume that the fix will be included in the latest > patch (here ’patch/fixed’). Last, please note that ’patch’ is barely > modified. OK. I don't mind to do this change. I'll send e revised version with that done. -- Thanks, Maxim
