Hi, On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 19:28, Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> guix refresh -u -L proj python-numpy-illustrated >> yields the error >> proj/example.scm:10:2: python-numpy-illustrated: updating from version 0.3 >> to version 0.3.1... >> proj/example.scm:10:2: warning: python-numpy-illustrated: no `version' field >> in source; skipping As mentioned in [1], the issue is from ’search-path’ – it returns #false – it is involved in several layers. See <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67048#3> for a patch proposal. Some details: When invoking “guix refresh” (guix scripts refresh): + It calls the procedure ’update-package’ + which calls ’update-package-source’; see guix/upstream.scm + which calls ’package-field-location’; see guix/package.scm (match (search-path %load-path file) ((? string? file-found) [...] (#f ;; FILE could not be found in %LOAD-PATH. #f))) -> Therefore in ’update-package-source’, the variable ’version-loc’ is false: (version-loc (package-field-location package 'version))) (if version-loc + Once fixed, later in ’update-package-source’, it reads, (file (and=> (location-file loc) (cut search-path %load-path <>)))) (if file -> Therefore, the variable ’file’ is false. + Once fixed, later in ’update-package-source’ it calls ’absolute-location’; see guix/diagnostics.scm. (if (string-prefix? "/" (location-file loc)) [...] (match (search-path %load-path (location-file loc)) (#f (raise (formatted-message Well, I do not know how to do better than <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67048#3>. WDYT? Cheers, simon 1: bug#67048: guix refresh -u -L does not work with relative path Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> Mon, 13 Nov 2023 19:28:25 +0100 id:8734x9fqye....@gmail.com https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67048 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/8734x9fqye....@gmail.com https://yhetil.org/guix/8734x9fqye....@gmail.com
