Hi,
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 18:11, Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> wrote:
> guix refresh -u -L proj python-numpy-illustrated
> yields the error
> proj/example.scm:10:2: python-numpy-illustrated: updating from version 0.3 to
> version 0.3.1...
> proj/example.scm:10:2: warning: python-numpy-illustrated: no `version' field
> in source; skipping
The issue is from several layers; (search-path %load-path file) returns
#false. See:
1. package-field-location from (guix packages)
called by update-package-source from (guix upstream)
2. update-package-source from (guix upstream)
called by package-update from same module
called by update-package from (guix scripts refresh)
The issue looks similar as #66901 [1]. Well, I have tried to improve
the situation by setting some ’canonicalize-path’ here or there.
However, then the next issue is from the call ’(absolute-location loc)’
in ’update-package-source’ from module (guix upstream); it returns:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
724:2 19 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handler (k proc)>)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
619:8 18 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7f45f4f17c80>)))
In guix/ui.scm:
2324:7 17 (run-guix . _)
2287:10 16 (run-guix-command _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1752:10 15 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
1752:10 14 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
In guix/store.scm:
659:37 13 (thunk)
2168:25 12 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7f45d56dc1e0>
#<procedure 7f45d5385ca0 at ice-9/eval.scm:333:13 (a)> #:guile-for-build _
#:system _ …)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
191:27 11 (_ #(#(#<directory (guix scripts refresh) 7f45ea7c1d20>
#<procedure 7f45d5385d60 at ice-9/eval.scm:333:13 (a)>) (#<<update-spec>
package…>) …))
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
152:2 10 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
152:2 9 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
152:2 8 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
619:8 7 (_ #(#(#<directory (guix scripts refresh) 7f45ea7c1d20>
(#<<update-spec> package: #<package python-numpy-illustrated@0.3
proj/example.s…>) …)))
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
634:9 6 (for-each #<procedure 7f45d41d1280 at ice-9/eval.scm:333:13 (a)>
(#<<update-spec> package: #<package python-numpy-illustrated@0.3 proj/exam…>))
In ice-9/eval.scm:
619:8 5 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guix upstream)
7f45e9af08c0>) #<package python-numpy-illustrated@0.…> …) …) …) …) …) …) …) …)
…) …) …))
155:9 4 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guix upstream)
7f45e9af08c0>) #<package python-numpy-illustrated@0.…> …) …) …) …) …) …) …) …)
…) …) …))
In guix/diagnostics.scm:
354:20 3 (absolute-location #<<location> file: "proj/example.scm" line: 10
column: 2>)
In unknown file:
2 (raise #<&formatted-message format: "file '~a' not found on load
path\n" arguments: ("proj/example.scm")>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #<&formatted-message format: "file '~a'
not found on load path\n" arguments: ("proj/example.scm")>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Hum, it needs to be investigated…
1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66901
Cheers,
simon
