On October 16, 2022 4:39:16 PM GMT+11:00, phodina <phod...@protonmail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >unfortunately incorrect hash was pushed in the last patchset. > >The patch is already part of the next patch series [1]. > >Also it's tracked here [2]. > >1 >https://github.com/phodina/guix/commit/4636279dfb3b96eb5836baad0d8ea36e58ff79ee >2 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57608#8 > >---- >Petr > > > > >Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > >------- Original Message ------- >On Sunday, October 16th, 2022 at 6:33 AM, 'Brendan Tildesley ><m...@brendan.scot> wrote: > > >> From: Brendan Tildesley m...@brendan.scot >> >> >> * gnu/packages/kde.scm (akregator)[phases]: Fix finding >> QtWebEngineProcess path. >> --- >> gnu/packages/kde.scm | 5 ++--- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde.scm b/gnu/packages/kde.scm >> index 37125b1d0b..d0ffb28505 100644 >> --- a/gnu/packages/kde.scm >> +++ b/gnu/packages/kde.scm >> @@ -167,9 +167,8 @@ (define-public akregator >> (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys) >> (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")) >> (bin (string-append out "/bin/akregator")) >> - (qt-process-path (string-append >> - (assoc-ref inputs "qtwebengine-5") >> - "/lib/qt5/libexec/QtWebEngineProcess"))) >> + (qt-process-path (search-input-file >> + inputs "/lib/qt5/libexec/QtWebEngineProcess"))) >> (wrap-program bin >> `("QTWEBENGINEPROCESS_PATH" = (,qt-process-path))))))))) >> (native-inputs >> -- >> 2.37.2
I think the correct way is to use something like search-input-file instead ungexping qtwebengine-5, right? Input transformations well not work otherwise?
