Hi,
I am also confused.
On dim., 16 oct. 2022 at 14:42, Brendan Tildesley <m...@brendan.scot> wrote:
> sha256 hash mismatch for
> /gnu/store/iv6ixlrvh0swq22fjal0cbfbr9ayaq7m-akregator-22.04.3.tar.xz:
> expected hash: 1yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8
> actual hash: 08n713271i7ifnbrgwrqmxvcpvj45wfqjiidw8zf9rpwxg2m2m9g
>
>
> However what concerned me more is that when I look in the source code it
> looks like this:
>
> (sha256
> (base32 "9yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8"))
>
> Notice how at the start its a '9', not a '1'?
Indeed, commit 6971feca53a19d60fdd2b39fb2a8966ccf1d6598 pushed on
core-updates reads,
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define-public akregator
(package
(name "akregator")
- (version "21.12.3")
+ (version "22.04.3")
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri (string-append "mirror://kde/stable/release-service/" version
"/src/akregator-" version ".tar.xz"))
(sha256
- (base32 "1yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8"))))
+ (base32 "9yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8"))))
(build-system qt-build-system)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> Is there a bug with how guix is reading/writing sha256 hashes?
Is it a mistake here? A human-typo replacing ’1’ by ’9’? Or
something else? Petr?
Then, indeed KDE did a in-place replacement since the hash is now,
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix download
https://mirrors.xtom.de/kde/stable/release-service/22.04.3/src/akregator-22.04.3.tar.xz
Starting download of /tmp/guix-file.JTZn04
>From
>https://mirrors.xtom.de/kde/stable/release-service/22.04.3/src/akregator-22.04.3.tar.xz...
….04.3.tar.xz 2.2MiB
22.2MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0%
/gnu/store/w4jqrza9ffsflim5ilwq7jr75rxicn1g-akregator-22.04.3.tar.xz
08n713271i7ifnbrgwrqmxvcpvj45wfqjiidw8zf9rpwxg2m2m9g
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
as submitted in patch#57608 [1].
1: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57608#1>
Cheers,
simon
