On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly > > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG > > 2.2.32.
I see that my message was confusing, with mixed up version numbers. There's no regressions on x86_64 with 2.2.32. Since it fixes this bug, I'd like to make it available soon. Maybe we can unhide the gnupg-2.2.32 variable, and remove emacs-pinentry, since everyone is saying that it's no longer useful.
