Hej Ludo,
thanks for the quick reply!
I just tried to pull again and yielded the same result.
Actually, no, there is nothing above these lines. Yet, let me copy/paste
the whole command in/output. It is in german but I guess the steps are
so common by now that it shouldnt be a problem to understand :)
# user@computer ~$ guix pull
# Kanal „guix“ wird vom Git-Repository auf
„https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git“ aktualisiert …
# Von diesen Kanälen wird erstellt:
# guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git 0713929
# guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
'/gnu/store/kpxami25fi3mrxb37sfbbx2s366chpk5-compute-guix-derivation'
# failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
"0713929685d2fd1970df1b1ce238ee7bd6e892f8"; system: "x86_64-linux";
# host version: "398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080";
pull-version: 1).
# Please report it by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.
Also, now I am sure it has nothing to do with ram. Apart from the
already available ram, I resized my swapdevice.
Is there anything else I should test? One thing I could do is to
roll-back (I did a upgrade/reconfigure cycle after installation). Should
I do that and then pull again?
Greetings,
Olivier
On 04.06.2020 22:00, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hello,
o.ro...@posteo.net skribis:
on a freshly installed and reconfigured machine, I receive the
following error:
# guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
'/gnu/store/kpxami25fi3mrxb37sfbbx2s366chpk5-compute-guix-derivation'
# failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
"790ada9168e0689c1c4607c61cdc1d2dbc327abf"; system: "x86_64-linux";
# host version: "398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080";
pull-version: 1).
Is there more info above these lines?
I tried to reproduce it with:
guix time-machine --commit=398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080 \
-- time-machine --commit=790ada9168e0689c1c4607c61cdc1d2dbc327abf \
-- describe
but it works for me.
I'm not entirely sure if, in this case, it is about RAM, as has been
mentioned in this thread: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/41710 . I do
have 24gb ram, but currently a small swap file, but that might be
totally unrelated.
24 GiB is more than enough.
Is the problem reproducible if you try again now?
Thanks for reporting the issue,
Ludo’.
