Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:
> Maybe “union”, “surround”, or… “profile”? “profile” is a tempting choice, but it’s treacherous because we might be blinded by the glow of the implementation of environments as volatile profiles. On the other hand: if we could also move some of the features of the “package” sub-command under “profile” (e.g. those that relate to the management of, well, profiles), that could be a winning move. Tricky. > (I’d reserve “guix spawn” or “guix run” for the tool that runs commands > in a least-authority environment, as we’ve discussed in the past.) Same. -- Ricardo
