Hey! On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 at 16:06, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> skribis: > > On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 at 11:35, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Is this statement acted? Is it the consensus by all the maintainers? > > All I’m saying is that what EuAndreh wrote above is correct; I’m not > stating anything as to what solution we should implement. :-) Héhé, it is an answer to the questions. ;-) > > Why do you say that "guix shell" does not reflect what the command is about? > > Because the command spawns a new shell with options (expanding it, > > isolating it, etc.) > > The command does not necessarily spawn a new shell; it spawns a command > in a well-defined environment, and that command might be a shell. What about "guix spawn"? All the best, simon
