For the record, patches about it have been sent to guix-patches as well: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2018-04/msg00332.html.
Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com> writes: > Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org> writes: > >> 2018-04-17 22:56 GMT+02:00 Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com>: >> >>> Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org> writes: >>> >>> > From f770998d0f0b56180e0c9a12f0946a77d7ff61a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> > From: Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org> >>> > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:31:05 +0200 >>> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ansible: Add missing inputs >>> > >>> > * gnu/packages/admin.scm (ansible)[native-inputs]: Add python2-bcrypt and >>> > python2-pynacl. >>> > --- >>> > gnu/packages/admin.scm | 5 ++++- >>> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> > >>> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm >>> > index aed997e5b..07401af72 100644 >>> > --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm >>> > +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm >>> > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ >>> > #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config) >>> > #:use-module (gnu packages popt) >>> > #:use-module (gnu packages python) >>> > + #:use-module (gnu packages password-utils) >>> > #:use-module (gnu packages python-crypto) >>> > #:use-module (gnu packages python-web) >>> > #:use-module (gnu packages terminals) >>> >>> This introduces a circular dependency between (gnu packages admin) and >>> (gnu packages password-utils). Perhaps we should move python-bcrypt to >>> python-crypto.scm. Thoughts? >>> >> >> Makes sense to me. The `python-py-bcrypt' package is already located there >> so it would make sense to have similar packages in the same place. > > I went ahead and did this in 7c16af4646fac789000495064a13284691dbeb75.
