Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org> writes: > 2018-04-17 22:56 GMT+02:00 Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com>: > >> Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org> writes: >> >> > From f770998d0f0b56180e0c9a12f0946a77d7ff61a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> > From: Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org> >> > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:31:05 +0200 >> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ansible: Add missing inputs >> > >> > * gnu/packages/admin.scm (ansible)[native-inputs]: Add python2-bcrypt and >> > python2-pynacl. >> > --- >> > gnu/packages/admin.scm | 5 ++++- >> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm >> > index aed997e5b..07401af72 100644 >> > --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm >> > +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm >> > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ >> > #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config) >> > #:use-module (gnu packages popt) >> > #:use-module (gnu packages python) >> > + #:use-module (gnu packages password-utils) >> > #:use-module (gnu packages python-crypto) >> > #:use-module (gnu packages python-web) >> > #:use-module (gnu packages terminals) >> >> This introduces a circular dependency between (gnu packages admin) and >> (gnu packages password-utils). Perhaps we should move python-bcrypt to >> python-crypto.scm. Thoughts? >> > > Makes sense to me. The `python-py-bcrypt' package is already located there > so it would make sense to have similar packages in the same place.
I went ahead and did this in 7c16af4646fac789000495064a13284691dbeb75.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
