Hello Eric, Eric Bavier <bav...@cray.com> skribis:
> scheme@(guile-user)> (@@ (gnu tests base) %simple-os) > $1 = #<<operating-system> > kernel: #<package linux-libre@4.15.7 ...> > kernel-arguments: () > bootloader: #<<bootloader-configuration> bootloader: ...> > initrd: #<procedure base-initrd ...> > initrd-modules: () > firmware: "komputilo" > host-name: #f > hosts-file: () > mapped-devices: (#<<file-system> device: "my-root" ...> > #<<file-system> ...> ...) > file-systems: () > swap-devices: (#<<user-account> name: "alice" ...> ...) > ... > > Notice e.g. the "firmware" field has that value that should be in > "host-name", which has the value "hosts-file" should have, and > "mapped-devices" has the value "file-systems" should have, etc. > > If you explicitely specify the new "initrd-modules" field this commit > added in (@ (gnu tests) %simple-os), then compilation proceeds as > expected. That sounds a lot like regular ABI breakage: a new <operating-system> field was added but gnu/tests/base.go wasn’t rebuilt, and thus was expecting the previous struct layout. Does “rm gnu/tests/base.go && make” suffice to fix this issue? Thanks, Ludo’.
