>> I noticed that 'guile-gnome' has two 'doc-url' fields. How can I handle >> this? (I ignored it for now.)
> I think it’s a mistake in this case (could you report it to Karl?). It > seems safe to ignore. Karl said: "[...] In general doc-url can occur more than once. I did that when a package has an overall documentation page and also many significant manuals. Besides guile-gnome, emacs is a prime example. In theory, I guess logo: could be duplicated [too] in the event of a package having more than one logo, but in practice that has never happened. [...] I thought of another field that can be repeated, too: doc-shop. E.g., in libc." So, should we create another field for 'doc-url'? And what's the best way to handle 'doc-shop'? Can we ignore it? > Never ever write ‘get-’ for getters. ;-) It provides no useful > information. See <package> and other records, as examples. I know; it's easy to end up with something like: getObject.getSetter.getString.getField() I found (name get-employee-name) in the manual and decided that it's a convention. What about 'set-' for setters?
pgpId4m794mzc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
