Hi, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi, > > Mike Gran <spk...@yahoo.com> writes: > >>> Hi Mike, >> >>> Do I understand correctly that any copyright license comes with an >>> implicit "lawful" condition so as to be considered valid, per the law of >>> USA at least? And that making this explicit is thus not considered a >>> restriction on the use? >> >> That is how I understand it. I am not a lawyer, but, I have had to read a >> fair number >> of government contracts. > > Thank you. To get confirmation from a more authoritative source, I've > asked the question to same to FSF Licensing & Compliance Team; I'll > report their response if any! Haven't heard back, but this doesn't seem to be an issue, after all. Closing. -- Thanks, Maxim
