Andy Wingo <wi...@igalia.com> skribis: > On Thu 11 Jan 2018 22:55, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> writes:
[...] >>>> Out of curiosity, is there a reason why you're using an unbuffered port >>>> in your use case? >>> >>> It’s to implement redirect à la socat: >>> >>> >>> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=17af5d51de7c40756a4a39d336f81681de2ba447 >> >> Why is an unbuffered port being used here? Can we change it to a >> buffered port? > > This was also a question I had! If you make it a buffered port at 4096 > bytes (for example), then get-bytevector-some works exactly like you > want it to, no? It might work, but that’s more by chance no? I mean, if we declare the port as buffered, then we give the I/O routines the “right” to fill in that buffer. WDYT? Thanks, Ludo’.
