On Wed 10 Jan 2018 17:58, Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> writes: > hi Andy and Ludo! > > What if developers enabled suspendable-ports and set the port to non-blocking? > For example, in the non-blocking asynchronous server, I registered > read/write waiter for suspendable-ports. And save > delimited-continuations then yield the current task. > In this situation, get-bytevector-n! will read n bytes with several > times yielding by the registered read-writer, from the caller's > perspective, get-bytevector-n! will return n bytes finally no matter > how many times it's yielded. > But how about the get-bytevector-some? Should it block just once and > return the first time read m bytes then return?
I think this is right. At most one block. FWIW we'd need to add support for get-bytevector-some to (ice-9 suspendable-ports) to get this to work. Andy
