Hi, Gregory Marton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having done these steps, it did indeed make check, and with the > --without-threads flag, it even passed the timeout tests! You mean that the problem that triggered this thread vanished? > I'm happy with this for now. Is non-threading ever likely to be > unsupported? There's no plan to remove mono-threading AFAIK. Thanks, Ludovic.
