Update of bug #64466 (group groff):

                  Status:                    None => Need Info
                 Summary: [ms] poorly diagnosed diversion error => [PATCH]
[ms] poorly diagnosed diversion error

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #4:

[comment #3 comment #3:]
> [comment #2 comment #2:]
>> [https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2026-08/msg00102.html Doug McIlroy
>> pointed out that nesting static keeps does not, in fact, make sense.]
> 
> Followups to Doug's email (not threaded in the archive because they cross a
> calendar-month boundary) are at
> http://lists.gnu.org/r/groff/2026-09/msg00002.html

Thanks, Dave!
 
> Typically when I open a bug report on behalf of someone else, I do it
> (quasi)anonymously so that savannah doesn't report me as an interested party.
>  I see I failed to do that here, possibly because I offered my own opinion in
> the original submission rather than merely reporting Doug's problem.  But I'm
> not an -ms user and have no opinion on proposed fixes to it.

Acknowledged.  At some point in the past 3 years, Doug created a Savannah
account.  I can't actually change who the "Submitter" is, though, or I'd take
care of that.

In the meantime
[https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2026-09/msg00002.html I did propose
a patch to the list] (that's the second message you cited above), and asked
for feedback, so I'm tagging this ticket "[PATCH]" and shifting its state to
"Need Info".


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64466>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to