Follow-up Comment #17, bug #66653 (group groff): Quick scribble to myself:
1. `delete this` after successfully undiverting a glyph node or composite
node?
2. What about composite nodes that really are composite? This might scotch
my ham-fisted, fixed-length "hexbuf".
$ cat ATTIC/undivert-composite-character.groff
.box DIV
time to meet the \[A ah]ga Kh\[a ah]n
.br
.box
.DIV
.asciify DIV
.DIV
To test the latter, I need to identify a non-Latin-1 composite character that
is covered in the URW fonts, I think. Otherwise the formatter knows the
composite character doesn't exist and discards it on input (and throws a
`char` warning).
Modern Greek text will definitely exercise this scenario.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66653>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
