Follow-up Comment #32, bug #66392 (group groff): [comment #31 comment #31:] > [comment #30 comment #30:] >> _Is_ there an issue with it? I mean with my diagnosis >> of the problem and the shape of my solution. > > Peter raised one in comment #18 and hasn't yet been able to respond to > your comment #21 rebuttal (probably due to the system upgrade he > mentions in comment #11).
I haven't responded because, complete and illuminating as Branden's diagnosis
is, it answers the "why" of "Why is \n[.hla] not global regardless of ev?"
without addressing the larger issue of whether it's a good idea for hla to be
ev dependent at all. The matter needs to be discussed, along with other ev
initialization issues raised in this thread. That's why I agree with Dave:
defer the hla change until after 1.24 and hash things out then.
> The needed alterations to macro packages is another part of that.
> It's more stuff to be done (impacting both you and Peter) to support
> a change that can just as easily wait till the next go-round.
Agreed.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66392>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
