Follow-up Comment #12, bug #66583 (group groff): [comment #10 comment #10:] > At 2024-12-22T19:07:30-0500, anonymous wrote: >> Follow-up Comment #9, bug #66583 (group groff): >> [comment #8 comment #8:] >> I merely stated what is logical and works pretty much everywhere else. > > s/what is logical/your assumptions/ > > Everywhere else? How many build systems have you mastered?
Surrounding something with a conditional which evaluates true does not
change the outcome in any programming or scripting language I know.
I don't see why that should work any different in m4/autotools.
>> It's not my fault that Autotools tend to defy logic.
>
> It is when you're submitting a patch to an Autotools-using project.
Look, if groff allowed building without docs like every other reasonable
software project does, I wouldn't have to spend several hours on this to
begin with. If you think it's not good enough, do it yourself next time
and I won't have to send you "incomplete" patches.
I am not gonna react to the rest since what I'm trying to say is clearly
flying right over your head.
~ onf
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66583>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
