Norihiro Tanaka wrote:
> I tryed it on grep-2.20, but didn't pass even EGexecute. So I think
> there may be also an another bug in front of there in master.
In current master, grep tests for matching with eolbyte to speed-up to
match with binary file, and `execute' is called in this process.
I recognize that an input buffer to pass to `execute' must have the
eolbyte at the top as sentimental, although I don't think that this bug
is caused by that.
From 77f329a8c34cc0acd287d73ba45081608c871f75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Norihiro Tanaka <nori...@kcn.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 07:53:06 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] grep: testing matching to with eolbyte, put sentimental in
input buffer
src/grep.c (grep): Testing matching to with eolbyte, put sentimental in input
buffer.
---
src/grep.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/grep.c b/src/grep.c
index bb5ba1c..5c0c179 100644
--- a/src/grep.c
+++ b/src/grep.c
@@ -2513,8 +2513,9 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
compile (keys, keycc);
free (keys);
+ char eolbytes[2] = { '\0', '\0' };
size_t match_size;
- skip_empty_lines = ((execute (&eolbyte, 1, &match_size, NULL) == 0)
+ skip_empty_lines = ((execute (&eolbytes[1], 1, &match_size, NULL) == 0)
== out_invert);
if ((argc - optind > 1 && !no_filenames) || with_filenames)
--
2.1.1
