On 4/16/22 20:28, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
maybe you should define a couple of macros like GNULIB_LLVM_CLANG_VER and GNULIB_APPLE_CLANG_VER
I hope we don't need to do that. This is software archaeology (Mac OS X 10.7.5 is so old that neither the Subject: line nor my patch got its name right, and nobody mentioned the mistake :-) and these macros would clutter the code for little benefit. Most Clang-specific code nowadays shouldn't use Clang version numbers; it should use __has_builtin etc.
